Search This Blog

Showing posts with label murder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label murder. Show all posts

Sunday, September 20, 2020

Offences affecting Human Body








( zoom to see the pic more clearly, also can click and opens in a new window)

culpable homicide and Murder part 2

Culpable homicide (Section 299)

Culpable homicide is covered under Section 299 of the Indian Penal Code. Culpable homicide means the act done by a person which causes the death of another with an intention of causing death or causing such bodily injury that is likely to cause death, or he has knowledge that the act committed by him is likely to cause death, is said to commit the offence of Culpable homicide.

Illustration 
  • A induces B to shoot at the place having the knowledge that Z was sitting behind a covered area. Here, A is liable for the offence of culpable homicide, as he had prior knowledge that Z was present in that area and his actions will lead to Z’s death. Here, intention makes A liable to culpable homicide.
  • Yamini is diagnosed with a terminal illness and to live from day to day he needs certain drugs. Zion confines Yamini in a room and prevents him from taking his medication. Here, Zion is guilty of culpable homicide.

Murder (sec 300)

Murder is defined under Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code. According to this Act, culpable homicide is considered as murder if:

  • The act is committed with an intention to cause death.
  • The act is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury which the offender has knowledge that it would result in death.
  • The person has the knowledge that his act is dangerous and would cause death or bodily injury but still commits the act, this would amount to murder.
Ingredients of Murder
  • Causing death: There should be an intention of causing death,
  • Doing an act: There should be an intention to cause such bodily injury that is likely to cause death, or
  • The act must be done: with the knowledge that the act is likely to cause the death of another. 
Illustrations
  • Abhi shoots Khan with an intention of killing him. As a result, Khan dies in that consequence, murder is committed by Abhi.
  • Dinesh intentionally gives a sword-cut to Raghu that was sufficient to cause the death of anyone in the ordinary course of nature. As a consequence, Raghu dies. Here, Dinesh is guilty of murder though he didn’t intend to cause Raghu’s death. 
Exceptions to Section 300 of IPC (where culpable homicide is not considered as murder)
  • Sudden and grave provocation 

If the offender is deprived of the power of self-control due to sudden and grave provocation, and his act causes the death of the person who provoked or death of any other person by accident or mistake.

This exception is subject to a certain proviso, that is:

  • That the provocation is not sought or is voluntarily provoked by the offender to be used as an excuse for killing or causing any harm to the person.
  • That the provocation is not given by anything that is done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant while exercising the powers lawfully of a public servant.
  • That the provocation is not done while doing any lawful exercise of the right of private defence.

Illustration

A is given grave and sudden provocation by C. A fires at C as a result of this provocation. A didn’t intend or have knowledge that his act is likely to kill C, who was out of A’s sight. A kills C. A is not liable to murder but is liable to culpable homicide.

Cases : 
  • K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra, 1961 ( can watch the movie Rustom)
In this case,the Supreme Court had extensively explained the law relating to provocation in India.
In this case,the Supreme Court had extensively explained the law relating to provocation in India.
  • Muthu v. state of Tamil Nadu, 2007, 
    ln this case, it was held by the Supreme Court that constant harassment might deprive the power of self-control, amounting to sudden and grave provocation.

  • When the person exceeds his right to private defence 

Where the act is committed to defend them from further harm. If the accused intentionally exceeds his right to private defence, then he is liable to murder. If it is unintentional, then the accused will be liable to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

 Illustration

  • X attempts to whip Y with a belt, not in a manner to cause grievous hurt to Y. A rod is drawn out by Y, X persists the assault. Y believes that he had no way to prevent himself from being whip by X, Y gives a blow at X. X is liable to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

 Case:
  •  Nathan v. State of Madras, 1972

In this case, the landlord was trying forcefully to evict the accused. The accused killed the landlord while exercising his right to private defence. There was no fear of death to the accused as the deceased was not holding any deadly weapon that could have caused grievous hurt or death of the accused. The deceased had no intention to kill the accused, thus, the accused exceeded his right of private defence. The accused was liable to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

  • Culpable homicide in case of Public Servant 

The act is done by a public servant who is acting to promote public justice. If the public servant commits an act which is necessary to discharge his duty as is done in good faith and he believes it to be lawful.

 Illustration
  • If the police officer goes to arrest a person, the person tries to run away and during that incident, if the police officer shoots the person, the police officer will not be guilty of murder.
 Case 
  •  Dakhi Singh v. State, 1955

In this case, the appellant was the constable of Railway Protection Force, while he was on duty he killed a fireman unintentionally, while he was firing bullet shots to catch the thief. The constable was entitled to benefit under this section section’s benefit.

  • Sudden Fight

The sudden fight is when the fight is unexpected or premeditated. Both the parties don’t have any intention to kill or cause the death of another. The fact that which party had assaulted or offered a provocation first is not important.

Case 

  • Radhey Shyam and Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2018

In this case, the appellant was extremely angry when he got to know that his calf had come to the deceased place. The appellant started abusing the deceased, when it was tried to stop him, the appellant fired at the deceased. The deceased was unarmed at that time, thus the appellant had an intention to kill the deceased, hence, he was held liable to murder.

  • Consent

If the act is committed with the consent of the victim. The consent should be unconditional, unequivocal and without any sort of reservation.

Illustration
  • A instigated F who was under 18 years of age, to commit suicide. F was incapable of giving consent to his own death. Therefore, A is guilty of murder.
  • X killed his foster father Y, who was old and infirm. X killed Y with his consent. This was punishable under Section 304.
Causing Death by negligence (Section 304A) 

Under Section 304A of IPC, if someone causes the death of another due to rash or negligent act that does not amount to culpable homicide, shall be punished with imprisonment which can extend up to two years or with fine or both.

Dowry Death (Section 304 B)

Section 304 B of IPC states that if within seven years of marriage a woman dies by a bodily injury or burns, or it is revealed that before the marriage the woman was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or by any other relative of her husband, in connection to the demand of dowry then the death of the woman will be considered as the dowry death.

The punishment for Dowry death is imprisonment for a minimum of seven years or a maximum of imprisonment for life. 

Attempt to murder (Section 307)

Section 307 of IPC deals with an attempt to murder. Whoever commits an act with an intention or knowledge and under such circumstances, that causes the death of the person would be held guilty of murder.

Illustrations

  • R shoots S with an intention to kill him. If under such circumstances death has ensued, R will be guilty of murder.
  • P, with an intention to cause death to Q, who is a child of seven years of age, leaves him in a deserted land. P commits an offence under this section, though the death of the child is not ensured.
Attempt to commit Culpable Homicide (Section 308)

Under Section 308 of IPC, whoever commits an act with such intention or such knowledge and under such circumstances, and if that act causes death, he would be guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Illustration

  • A due to sudden and grave provocation fires at Z. If Z dies due to this incident, A will be guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Punishment






















For more details and notes please visit, share, follow and subscribe to the blog and youtube channel adityapedia. Dont forget to like our fb page too. Its just a click away - absolutely FREE

Thursday, September 10, 2020

Extortion IPC 383

 


Extortion is defined in Section 383 of IPC as appropriation of property by coercion.

The essential ingredients of the offence of extortion are:

  • intentionally putting a person in fear of injury (imminent threat and injury to a person.)
  • The act must be done intentionally and deceitfully.
  • An unreasonable force should be shown through which a person seeks to take the property or any other valuable goods of another person or any document.
  • the purpose of which is to dishonestly induce the person put in fear to deliver property or valuable security.


Illustration: 











X demands money or valuables from A by causing immediate fear of killing A's Child at point of a gun, A gives money and valuables as demanded by X, then X has an offence of extortion

Case Law:

Romesh Chandra Arora v State

The accused had written letters to one X enclosing photograph of his daughter in the nude, which he took by threatening the girl and demanded hush money from X and threatened X that he would circulate them to the relatives of X if the money was not paid. 

He was convicted for extortion and criminal intimidation.


Punishment (section 384 of IPC)

Punishment for extortion is enshrined under section Section 384 of the Indian penal code.
A person committing such offence shall be punished with the imprisonment of 3 years or with fine or both.







For more details and notes please visit, share, follow and subscribe to the blog and youtube channel adityapedia. Dont forget to like our fb page too. Its just a click away - absolutely FREE

Sunday, September 6, 2020

Dacoity

 

 Dacoity - IPC Section 391 

  • Section 391 of the Indian Penal Code defines the act of Dacoity. 
  • When there are five or more persons who jointly commit the act of robbery or attempt to commit robbery, they are liable for the act of dacoity. 
  • If any person aids these persons or attempts to aid, then he shall also be liable for the dacoity in the same manner as others are liable.

Punishment For Dacoity

  • the punishment for it is defined under Section 395 of the IPC
  • Any group of five or more persons who commit dacoity shall be punished for life imprisonment or for rigorous imprisonment up to 10 years and shall also be liable for fine.

Dacoity With Murder  IPC Section 396

  • Aggravated form of dacoity is defined under section 396 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 
  • Under  Section 396 aggravated form is defined as dacoity with murder. It says that if anyone of five or more than five persons, who are conjointly committing dacoity, commits murder in so committing dacoity, every one of those persons shall be punished with death and shall also be liable to fine.

The ingredients of Section 396 are:

  • The offence of dacoity must be committed with the joint act of the accused persons; 
  • Murder must be committed in course of the commission of the dacoity.
Under Section 396 of the IPC, it is not necessary to prove whether the murder was committed by a single person or it was committed by all of them. It is also not necessary to prove the common intention. The prosecution is only required to prove that the murder was committed while committing the dacoity. If the prosecution successfully proves that the murder was committed while committing dacoity, then all of the members will be punished under Section 396 of the IPC.

Preparation To Commit Dacoity

There are four stages of crime – 

























The general rule is that either the attempt is punished or a complete offence. The stage of preparation is not punished. But this is not so in the case of dacoity. If any person does preparations to commit dacoity, then such person shall be punished for rigorous imprisonment up to 10 years and will also be liable for fine.


Mensrea (IPC section 34 -common intention)

Before committing any offence intention plays a very important role in it. Under criminal law, the intention is known by Mens Rea. Mens rea means guilty of Mind. For every criminal offence, there should be Mens rea on the part of the offender. If put in other words it means that there has to be intention to commit a crime. The term “Intention”  has not explicitly defined under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 But under IPC section 34 of it deals with common intention. 
This section requires a particular criminal intention or knowledge and the act should be committed by more than one person. Everyone who joins the act with the knowledge of the consequences, all of them should be made liable under this section.


Preparation (IPC Section 399- preparation to commit dacoity )

It says that whoever makes any preparation for committing dacoity shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.  

Assembling for the Purpose of Committing Dacoity (IPC-Section 402)

Assembling for purpose of committing dacoity is defined under Section 402 of the Indian Penal Code. It says that whoever, at any time after the passing of the act, shall be one of five or more persons assembled for the purpose of committing dacoity, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.

Belonging to Gangs of Dacoits (Section 400 of the IPC)

Belonging to gangs of dacoits is defined under Section 400 of the IPC. It says that anybody who at any time after the passing of this act, shall belong to a gang of persons associated for the purpose of habitually committing dacoity will be punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.




For more details and notes please visit, share, follow and subscribe to the blog and youtube channel adityapedia. Dont forget to like our fb page too. Its just a click away - absolutely FREE

Sunday, August 9, 2020

COGNIZABLE AND NON-COGNIZABLE OFFENCES

COGNIZABLE AND NON-COGNIZABLE OFFENCES

Schedule I of CrPC which refers to all the offences under the Indian Penal Code and puts them into cognizable and non-cognizable categories.


Cognizable offence:

  • Cognizable offenses are of much serious nature. 
  • In a Cognizable offense, the police officer can arrest a person without a warrant. 
  • A cognizable offense is defined under section 2 (c) of the CrPC. 
  • The moment it is intimated to the police that any offense which is cognizable in nature has been committed in its local jurisdiction, the police are bound to register an FIR under section 154 of the CrPC.  
  • The seriousness of the offence leads for maximum punishment. A cognizable offense is an offense which is punishable with imprisonment for 3 years or more. 
  • A complaint can also be given to a Magistrate and the Magistrate orders the officer in- charge and forwards the complaint. The officer then registers the FIR. 
  • In a cognizable offense, the police can start the investigation immediately after filing the FIR. No permission from the Magistrate is required.
  • offenses which are serious in nature examples offences-

  1. Waging or attempting to wage war, or abetting the waging of war against the government of India,
  2. Murder,
  3. Rape, 
  4. Dowry Death,
  5. Kidnapping,
  6. Theft,
  7. Criminal Breach of Trust,
  8. Unnatural Offenses.

Non Cognizable offence:

  • Non Cognizable offenses have been defined under section 2 (I), of Cr.PC. as an offense. 
  • A police officer has no authority to arrest without warrant.
  • Such offences are minimal offences where the injury done to the society is comparatively small. 
  • The aggrieved party expected to file a complaint before criminal proceedings starts.
  • There are punishable with imprisonment for less than 3 years or with fine only.
  • A police officer cannot arrest without a warrant and such an officer has neither the duty nor the power to investigate into such offences without the authority given by a Judicial Magistrate.

  • These offences are not much serious in nature like 
    1. Assault,
    2. Cheating,
    3. Forgery






For more details and notes please visit, share, follow and subscribe to the blog and youtube channel adityapedia. dont forget to like our fb page too. Its just a click away - absolutely FREE