1872, the Indian Contract Act
In 1872, the Indian Contract Act defined the line between void and illegal agreements.
- The illegal agreement of a kidnapper for hire. Because kidnapping is illegal, two parties can't make a contract to kidnap. If he isn't paid his fee, a kidnapper can't go to court and sue the other party for breach of contract because the contract is illegal and void.
- whereas, It is possible for a broker to file a lawsuit against the principal to recover his commission from a wagering contract.
A void agreement means that the consensus between two parties isn't legally binding.
When an agreement becomes void, it can no longer be enforced by law and loses its legally binding nature.
In a void agreement, neither party has any legal rights or obligations or any kind of legal status. However, any transactions linked to a void agreement are valid. When an agreement is void, money that has been paid can be claimed back.
Certain types of agreements are considered void from the beginning according to the Indian Contract Act, including:
- Agreement that restricts marriage
- Agreement that restricts legal proceeding
- Agreement that restricts trade
- Agreement that is considered illegal
- Wagering agreement
- Agreement with a minor
Connected agreements are not always void and can be valid in some situations.
An illegal agreement is any contract that is forbidden by law.
This includes any agreement that is against the law, is criminal, or that is against public policy. Illegal agreements are invalid from their creation, meaning that agreements associated with the original contract are also considered void. Because illegal agreements are against the law, joining an illegal agreement can also bring punishment.
Both parties to the agreement receive the same punishment according to the Indian Penal Code.
- Raghu agree to sell the smuggled goods to Shyam for 5 lakhs. Shyam accepts and buys them.
The agreement between them is void and illegal. - Raghu agrees to sell his 1 acre land to Shyam for 10 Lakhs, where Shyam is a minor.
the Agreement between them are void but not illegal. (Shyam is a minor)
A void contract is considered invalid from its creation, most commonly due to not having the normal requirements of a valid contract.
example
- Ramu and Shamu (both below the age of 18 years) enters into a contract to purchase a land in their name.
- Ramu and Shyam enters into an agreement to supply drugs near a school to the students of that school.
However, a voidable contract starts out as a valid contract. The unbound party has the option to either affirm or reject the contract, but the bound party isn't allowed to do so. Essentially, only the unbound party can cancel the agreement within a reasonable timeframe. This most often happens when one party enters the contract without free consent.
Void contracts include things like the following:
- Contract between legally incompetent parties or minors
- Contract that restricts trade
- Contract with uncertain material terms
- Contract that involves betting or gambling
Voidable contracts include the following:
- Contract with a party that has been misrepresented or coerced
- Contract where one party is a minor
For more details and notes please visit, share, follow and subscribe to the blog and youtube channel adityapedia. Dont forget to like our fb page too. Its just a click away - absolutely FREE
No comments:
Post a Comment