Search This Blog

Tuesday, September 29, 2020

sexual harassment in the workplace

 


What is Sexual harassment 

Sexual harassment includes such unwelcome sexually determined behavior (whether directly or by implication) as:

  1. physical contact and advances;
  2. a demand or request for sexual favors;
  3. sexually colored remarks;
  4. showing pornography;
  5. any other unwelcome physical verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature.

Sexual harassment need not involve physical contact. Any act that creates a hostile work environment - be it by virtue of cracking lewd jokes, verbal abuse, circulating lewd rumours etc. counts as sexual harassment

Background of Vishaka vs State of Rajasthan case 


During the 1990s, Rajasthan state government employee Bhanwari Devi who tried to prevent child marriage as part of her duties as a worker of the Women Development Programme was raped by the landlords of the gujjar community. The feudal patriarchs who were enraged by her raped her repeatedly. The rape survivor did not get justice from Rajasthan High Court and the rapists were allowed to go free. This enraged a women's rights group called Vishaka that filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court of India.


This case brought to the attention of the Supreme Court of India, "the absence of domestic law occupying the field, to formulate effective measures to check the evil of sexual harassment of working women at all work places."

The court decided that the consideration of "International Conventions and norms are significant for the purpose of interpretation of the guarantee of gender equality, right to work with human dignity in Articles 14, 15 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution and the safeguards against sexual harassment implicit therein."


Vishaka Guidelines

with regard to 'human rights' in Section 2(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993,  certain guidelines to ensure the prevention of sexual harassment of women:

1. Duty of the Employer or other responsible persons in work places and other institutions:

It shall be the duty of the employer or other responsible persons in work places or other institutions to prevent or deter the commission of acts of sexual harassment and to provide the procedures for the resolution, settlement or prosecution of acts of sexual harassment by taking all steps required.

2. Definition:

For this purpose, sexual harassment includes such unwelcome sexually determined behaviour (whether directly or by implication) as:

a) physical contact and advances;

b) a demand or request for sexual favours;

c) sexually coloured remarks;

d) showing pornography;

e) any other unwelcome physical verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature.

Where any of these acts is committed in circumstances where under the victim of such conduct has a reasonable apprehension that in relation to the victim's employment or work whether she is drawing salary, or honorarium or voluntary, whether in government, public or private enterprise such conduct can be humiliating and may constitute a health and safety problem. It is discriminatory for instance when the woman has reasonable grounds to believe that her objection would disadvantage her in connection with her employment or work including recruiting or promotion or when it creates a hostile work environment. Adverse consequences might be visited if the victim does not consent to the conduct in question or raises any objection thereto.

3. Preventive Steps:

All employers or persons in charge of work place whether in the public or private sector should take appropriate steps to prevent sexual harassment. Without prejudice to the generality of this obligation they should take the following steps:

(a) Express prohibition of sexual harassment as defined above at the work place should be notified, published and circulated in appropriate ways.

(b) The Rules/Regulations of Government and Public Sector bodies relating to conduct and discipline should include rules/regulations prohibiting sexual harassment and provide for appropriate penalties in such rules against the offender.

(c) As regards private employers steps should be taken to include the aforesaid prohibitions in the standing orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

(d) Appropriate work conditions should be provided in respect of work, leisure, health and hygiene to further ensure that there is no hostile environment towards women at work places and no employee woman should have reasonable grounds to believe that she is disadvantaged in connection with her employment.

4. Criminal Proceedings:

Where such conduct amounts to a specific offence under the Indian Penal Code or under any other law the employer shall initiate appropriate action in accordance with law by making a complaint with the appropriate authority.

In particular, it should ensure that victims, or witnesses are not victimized or discriminated against while dealing with complaints of sexual harassment. The victims of sexual harassment should have the option to seek transfer of the perpetrator or their own transfer.

5. Disciplinary Action:

Where such conduct amounts to mis-conduct in employment as defined by the relevant service rules, appropriate disciplinary action should be initiated by the employer in accordance with those rules.

6. Complaint Mechanism:

Whether or not such conduct constitutes an offence under law or a breach of the service rules, an appropriate complaint mechanism should be created in the employer's organization for redress of the complaint made by the victim. Such complaint mechanism should ensure time bound treatment of complaints.

7. Complaints Committee:

The complaint mechanism, a Complaints Committee, a special counsellor or other support service, including the maintenance of confidentiality.

The Complaints Committee should be headed by a woman and not less than half of its member should be women.

Further, to prevent the possibility of any under pressure or influence from senior levels, such Complaints Committee should involve a third party, either NGO or other body who is familiar with the issue of sexual harassment.

The Complaints Committee must make an annual report to the government department concerned of the complaints and action taken by them. The employers and person in charge will also report on the compliance with the aforesaid guidelines including on the reports of the Complaints Committee to the Government department.

8. Workers' Initiative:

Employees should be allowed to raise issues of sexual harassment at workers meeting and in other appropriate forum and it should be affirmatively discussed in Employer-Employee Meetings.

9. Awareness:

Awareness of the rights of female employees in this regard should be created in particular by prominently notifying the guidelines (and appropriate legislation when enacted on the subject) in suitable manner.

10. Where sexual harassment occurs as a result of an act or omission by any third party or outsider, the employer and person in charge will take all steps necessary and reasonable to assist the affected person in terms of support and preventive action.

Consequences

National Commission for Women has asked the government to ensure constitution of Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines in its departments, institutions and autonomous bodies to address such cases. It has also recommended conducting gender sensitisation workshops for top level management officials.

NCW recommended publicizing committee using posters, etc. and explicitly mention the contact details of the members. The commission also highlighted the need for orientation programs for employees to sensitize them on sexual harassment. Another recommendation was to enhance communication strategies to combat violation against women.

The rules for the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 came into force on 9 December 2013. 




Saturday, September 26, 2020

Rohingya crisis

 
Rohingys crisis-  an ethnic cleansing


In January 2020, the UN's top court ordered the Buddhist-majority country to take measures to protect members of its Rohingya community from genocide.

But the army in Myanmar (formerly Burma) has said it was fighting Rohingya militants and denies targeting civilians. The country's leader Aung San Suu Kyi, once a human rights icon, has repeatedly denied allegations of genocide.

Who are the Rohingya?

Described by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres as "one of, if not the, most discriminated people in the world", the Rohingya are one of Myanmar's many ethnic minorities.

The Rohingya, who numbered around one million in Myanmar at the start of 2017, are one of the many ethnic minorities in the country. Rohingya Muslims represent the largest percentage of Muslims in Myanmar, with the majority living in Rakhine state.

They have their own language and culture and say they are descendants of Arab traders and other groups who have been in the region for generations.

But the government of Myanmar, a predominantly Buddhist country, denies the Rohingya citizenship and even excluded them from the 2014 census, refusing to recognise them as a people.

It sees them as illegal immigrants from Bangladesh Since the 1970s, Rohingya have migrated across the region in significant numbers. Estimates of their numbers are often much higher than official figures.

In the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of Rohingya made perilous journeys out of Myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.

Why did they flee their homes?

The exodus began on 25 August 2017 after Rohingya Arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.



What has the international response been?

A report published by UN investigators in August 2018 accused Myanmar's military of carrying out mass killings and rapes with "genocidal intent".

The ICJ case, lodged by the small Muslim-majority nation of The Gambia, in West Africa, on behalf of dozens of other Muslim countries, called for emergency measures to be taken against the Myanmar military, known as Tatmadaw, until a fuller investigation could be launched.

Aung San Suu Kyi rejected allegations of genocide when she appeared at the court in December 2019

But in January 2020, the court's initial ruling ordered Myanmar to take emergency measures to protect the Rohingya from being persecuted and killed.

While the ICJ only rules on disputes between states, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has the authority to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. The body approved a full investigation into the case of the Rohingya in Myanmar in November.

Although Myanmar itself is not a member of the court, the ICC ruled it had jurisdiction in the case because Bangladesh, where victims fled to, is a member.

Myanmar has long denied carrying out genocide and says it is carrying out its own investigations into the events of 2017. The country's Independent Commission of Enquiry (ICOE) admitted that members of the security forces may have carried out "war crimes, serious human rights violations, and violations of domestic law", but claimed there was no evidence of genocide.

Its full report has not yet been released, but questions have been raised.

What is happening to the Rohingya now?

With more than half a million Rohingya believed to still be living in Myanmar's northern Rakhine province, UN investigators have warned there is a "serious risk that genocidal actions may occur or recur".

The situation that led to "killings, rapes and gang rapes, torture, forced displacement and other grave rights violations" in 2017 remained unchanged, the investigators said in September, blaming a lack of accountability and Myanmar's failure to fully investigate allegations or criminalise genocide.

Rakhine province itself is the site of an ongoing conflict between the army and rebels from the Buddhist-majority Rakhine ethnic group.

What about the refugees?

The massive numbers of refugees who fled to Bangladesh in 2017 joined hundreds of thousands of Rohingya who had fled Myanmar in previous years.

Kutupalong, the largest refugee settlement in the world according to UNHCR, is home to more than 600,000 refugees alone.

But in March 2019, Bangladesh announced it would no longer accept Rohingya fleeing Myanmar.

While an agreement for the return of refugees was reached in early 2018, none returned. They said they would not consider going back to Myanmar unless they were given guarantees they would be given citizenship.





Content: BBC news

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

difference between void and illegal agreements

 1872, the Indian Contract Act 


 In 1872, the Indian Contract Act defined the line between void and illegal agreements.

Every illegal agreement is void, but not every void agreement is illegal. A void agreement is most likely not allowed by law, and an agreement that is illegal is stringently not allowed by law. Both parties can be disciplined for joining an illegal agreement. Because a void agreement is invalid from the start, it doesn't have any legal consequences. No aspect of an illegal agreement is ever considered legal. 

example:  
  • The illegal agreement of a kidnapper for hire. Because kidnapping is illegal, two parties can't make a contract to kidnap. If he isn't paid his fee, a kidnapper can't go to court and sue the other party for breach of contract because the contract is illegal and void.
  • whereas,  It is possible for a broker to file a lawsuit against the principal to recover his commission from a wagering contract.

Void Agreement

A void agreement means that the consensus between two parties isn't legally binding.
When an agreement becomes void, it can 
no longer be enforced by law and loses its legally binding nature.
In a void agreement, neither party has any legal rights or obligations or any kind of legal status. However, any transactions linked to a void agreement are valid. When an agreement is void, money that has been paid can be claimed back.

Certain types of agreements are considered void from the beginning according to the Indian Contract Act, including:

  • Agreement that restricts marriage
  • Agreement that restricts legal proceeding
  • Agreement that restricts trade
  • Agreement that is considered illegal
  • Wagering agreement
  • Agreement with a minor

Connected agreements are not always void and can be valid in some situations.

 

Illegal Agreement 

An illegal agreement is any contract that is forbidden by law.
This includes any agreement that is against the law, is criminal, or that is against public policy. Illegal agreements are invalid from their creation, meaning that agreements associated with the original contract are also considered void. Because illegal agreements are against the law, joining an illegal agreement can also bring punishment.
Both parties to the agreement receive the same punishment according to the Indian Penal Code.

  • Raghu agree to sell the smuggled goods to Shyam for 5 lakhs. Shyam accepts and buys them. 
    The agreement between them is void and illegal.

  • Raghu agrees to sell his 1 acre land to Shyam for 10 Lakhs, where Shyam is a minor.
    the Agreement between them are void but not illegal. (Shyam is a minor)
Void Vs Voidable Contract

A void contract is considered invalid from its creation, most commonly due to not having the normal requirements of a valid contract.

example 

  • Ramu and Shamu (both below the age of 18 years) enters into a contract to purchase a land in their name.
A contract where both parties are minors is void because minors don't have legal capacity

  • Ramu and Shyam enters into an agreement to supply drugs near a school to the students of that school.
An agreement to traffic drugs is void and illegal because it violates the law.

However, a voidable contract starts out as a valid contract. The unbound party has the option to either affirm or reject the contract, but the bound party isn't allowed to do so. Essentially, only the unbound party can cancel the agreement within a reasonable timeframe. This most often happens when one party enters the contract without free consent.

Void contracts include things like the following:

  • Contract between legally incompetent parties or minors
  • Contract that restricts trade
  • Contract with uncertain material terms
  • Contract that involves betting or gambling

Voidable contracts include the following:

  • Contract with a party that has been misrepresented or coerced
  • Contract where one party is a minor





For more details and notes please visit, share, follow and subscribe to the blog and youtube channel adityapedia. Dont forget to like our fb page too. Its just a click away - absolutely FREE

Sunday, September 20, 2020

Offences affecting Human Body








( zoom to see the pic more clearly, also can click and opens in a new window)

culpable homicide and Murder part 2

Culpable homicide (Section 299)

Culpable homicide is covered under Section 299 of the Indian Penal Code. Culpable homicide means the act done by a person which causes the death of another with an intention of causing death or causing such bodily injury that is likely to cause death, or he has knowledge that the act committed by him is likely to cause death, is said to commit the offence of Culpable homicide.

Illustration 
  • A induces B to shoot at the place having the knowledge that Z was sitting behind a covered area. Here, A is liable for the offence of culpable homicide, as he had prior knowledge that Z was present in that area and his actions will lead to Z’s death. Here, intention makes A liable to culpable homicide.
  • Yamini is diagnosed with a terminal illness and to live from day to day he needs certain drugs. Zion confines Yamini in a room and prevents him from taking his medication. Here, Zion is guilty of culpable homicide.

Murder (sec 300)

Murder is defined under Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code. According to this Act, culpable homicide is considered as murder if:

  • The act is committed with an intention to cause death.
  • The act is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury which the offender has knowledge that it would result in death.
  • The person has the knowledge that his act is dangerous and would cause death or bodily injury but still commits the act, this would amount to murder.
Ingredients of Murder
  • Causing death: There should be an intention of causing death,
  • Doing an act: There should be an intention to cause such bodily injury that is likely to cause death, or
  • The act must be done: with the knowledge that the act is likely to cause the death of another. 
Illustrations
  • Abhi shoots Khan with an intention of killing him. As a result, Khan dies in that consequence, murder is committed by Abhi.
  • Dinesh intentionally gives a sword-cut to Raghu that was sufficient to cause the death of anyone in the ordinary course of nature. As a consequence, Raghu dies. Here, Dinesh is guilty of murder though he didn’t intend to cause Raghu’s death. 
Exceptions to Section 300 of IPC (where culpable homicide is not considered as murder)
  • Sudden and grave provocation 

If the offender is deprived of the power of self-control due to sudden and grave provocation, and his act causes the death of the person who provoked or death of any other person by accident or mistake.

This exception is subject to a certain proviso, that is:

  • That the provocation is not sought or is voluntarily provoked by the offender to be used as an excuse for killing or causing any harm to the person.
  • That the provocation is not given by anything that is done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant while exercising the powers lawfully of a public servant.
  • That the provocation is not done while doing any lawful exercise of the right of private defence.

Illustration

A is given grave and sudden provocation by C. A fires at C as a result of this provocation. A didn’t intend or have knowledge that his act is likely to kill C, who was out of A’s sight. A kills C. A is not liable to murder but is liable to culpable homicide.

Cases : 
  • K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra, 1961 ( can watch the movie Rustom)
In this case,the Supreme Court had extensively explained the law relating to provocation in India.
In this case,the Supreme Court had extensively explained the law relating to provocation in India.
  • Muthu v. state of Tamil Nadu, 2007
    ln this case, it was held by the Supreme Court that constant harassment might deprive the power of self-control, amounting to sudden and grave provocation.

  • When the person exceeds his right to private defence 

Where the act is committed to defend them from further harm. If the accused intentionally exceeds his right to private defence, then he is liable to murder. If it is unintentional, then the accused will be liable to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

 Illustration

  • X attempts to whip Y with a belt, not in a manner to cause grievous hurt to Y. A rod is drawn out by Y, X persists the assault. Y believes that he had no way to prevent himself from being whip by X, Y gives a blow at X. X is liable to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

 Case:
  •  Nathan v. State of Madras, 1972

In this case, the landlord was trying forcefully to evict the accused. The accused killed the landlord while exercising his right to private defence. There was no fear of death to the accused as the deceased was not holding any deadly weapon that could have caused grievous hurt or death of the accused. The deceased had no intention to kill the accused, thus, the accused exceeded his right of private defence. The accused was liable to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

  • Culpable homicide in case of Public Servant 

The act is done by a public servant who is acting to promote public justice. If the public servant commits an act which is necessary to discharge his duty as is done in good faith and he believes it to be lawful.

 Illustration
  • If the police officer goes to arrest a person, the person tries to run away and during that incident, if the police officer shoots the person, the police officer will not be guilty of murder.
 Case 
  •  Dakhi Singh v. State, 1955

In this case, the appellant was the constable of Railway Protection Force, while he was on duty he killed a fireman unintentionally, while he was firing bullet shots to catch the thief. The constable was entitled to benefit under this section section’s benefit.

  • Sudden Fight

The sudden fight is when the fight is unexpected or premeditated. Both the parties don’t have any intention to kill or cause the death of another. The fact that which party had assaulted or offered a provocation first is not important.

Case 

  • Radhey Shyam and Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2018

In this case, the appellant was extremely angry when he got to know that his calf had come to the deceased place. The appellant started abusing the deceased, when it was tried to stop him, the appellant fired at the deceased. The deceased was unarmed at that time, thus the appellant had an intention to kill the deceased, hence, he was held liable to murder.

  • Consent

If the act is committed with the consent of the victim. The consent should be unconditional, unequivocal and without any sort of reservation.

Illustration
  • A instigated F who was under 18 years of age, to commit suicide. F was incapable of giving consent to his own death. Therefore, A is guilty of murder.
  • X killed his foster father Y, who was old and infirm. X killed Y with his consent. This was punishable under Section 304.
Causing Death by negligence (Section 304A) 

Under Section 304A of IPC, if someone causes the death of another due to rash or negligent act that does not amount to culpable homicide, shall be punished with imprisonment which can extend up to two years or with fine or both.

Dowry Death (Section 304 B)

Section 304 B of IPC states that if within seven years of marriage a woman dies by a bodily injury or burns, or it is revealed that before the marriage the woman was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or by any other relative of her husband, in connection to the demand of dowry then the death of the woman will be considered as the dowry death.

The punishment for Dowry death is imprisonment for a minimum of seven years or a maximum of imprisonment for life. 

Attempt to murder (Section 307)

Section 307 of IPC deals with an attempt to murder. Whoever commits an act with an intention or knowledge and under such circumstances, that causes the death of the person would be held guilty of murder.

Illustrations

  • R shoots S with an intention to kill him. If under such circumstances death has ensued, R will be guilty of murder.
  • P, with an intention to cause death to Q, who is a child of seven years of age, leaves him in a deserted land. P commits an offence under this section, though the death of the child is not ensured.
Attempt to commit Culpable Homicide (Section 308)

Under Section 308 of IPC, whoever commits an act with such intention or such knowledge and under such circumstances, and if that act causes death, he would be guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Illustration

  • A due to sudden and grave provocation fires at Z. If Z dies due to this incident, A will be guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Punishment






















For more details and notes please visit, share, follow and subscribe to the blog and youtube channel adityapedia. Dont forget to like our fb page too. Its just a click away - absolutely FREE

OFFENCES AFFECTING HUMAN BODY

OFFENCES AFFECTING HUMAN BODY



 







For more details and notes please visit, share, follow and subscribe to the blog and youtube channel adityapedia. Dont forget to like our fb page too. Its just a click away - absolutely FREE

Thursday, September 17, 2020

Murder and Culpable Homicide



This blog will discuss the main aspects of culpable homicide and murder.This will give a quick insight to the vast and most important topic of IPC. Part 2 will discuss some of the same heading in detail and its exceptions.

Culpable Homicides and Murder
Part 1 

Often we find-

"All murders are culpable homicides but all culpable homicides are not murders." 

as a familiar question in almost all our law based exam, and get struck as how to answer this? Now we will read and understand the same in simple way.

All crimes comprise of two components mens rea and actus reus, if any of them is missing then the committed act did not fall under the ambit of crime.

 

Homicide etymologically comes from Latin word “homa” meaning man and cide” meaning cut. 
The term means either the act of killing of one human being by another or a person who kills another. The Indian Penal code defines homicide as a killing of human being by a human being, it may be lawful or unlawful.
 Culpable homicide is further divided into two categories: 

  • Culpable homicide amounting to murder.
  • Culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
















Culpable Homicide: 

The word culpable derived from Latin word culpabills’ which means worthy of blame and homicide means to kill.

It is defined as “Whosoever causes death by doing an act with the intention of causing death or with the intention of causing such bodily injury as it is likely to cause death or with the knowledge that he is likely by such act to cause death , commits the offence of Culpable Homicide .” under Sec 299 of IPC. 

principle ingredients of Culpable homicide :

  • Causing death of human being.
  • The intention of causing death.
  • The intention of causing a bodily injury that likely to cause death
  • The knowledge of the act which is likely to cause death

Illustration 

  • A induces B to put the snake at the place having the knowledge that C was sitting on the otherside of the door. Here, A is liable for the offence of culpable homicide, as he had prior knowledge that C was present in that area and his actions will lead to C’s death. Here, intention makes A liable to culpable homicide.

  • E is diagnosed with a terminal illness and to live from day to day he needs certain drugs. G confines H in a room and prevents him from taking his medication. Here, G is guilty of culpable homicide.

Cases

 Reg. v. Govinda, 1876 

the accused had knocked down his wife, kept a knee on her chest and gave two to three violent blows with the closed fist on her face. This act produced extraversion of blood on her brain and afterwards, the wife died due to this. The act was not committed with the intention of causing death and the bodily injury was not sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. The accused was liable to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

RELEVANT PROVISION FOR CULPABLE HOMICIDE


Murder:

It can be defined as an aggravated form of culpable homicide. Murder is commonly understood as an act of killing human being intentionally (with knowledge of act) and unlawfully by another.
The term murder is derived from the Germanic word which means ‘secret killing’.
Under Sec 300 of IPC, there is no straight definition for murder which is provided but it is explained in reference with the previous section it reads as: 

“Except in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or-

Secondly-If it is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows ‘to be likely to cause the death’ of the person to whom the harm is caused, or–

Thirdly-If it is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, or–

Fourthly-If the person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must, in all probability, cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury as aforesaid.”

Illustration 

  • X intending to kill Y by​​ poisoning​​ purchases poison and mixes the same with a glass of milk. He gives the glass to Z to serve it to Y. Z drinks the milk​​ and dies. 

  • A snake charmer while showing his play claims to cure the snake bite. The deceased got himself a snake bite believing on assurance of the snake charmer. The snake charmer could​​ not​​ cure the deceased. The snake charmer is liable for Murder 

some of the famous murder cases:

  • Arushi Talwar case( Noida Twin Murder Case)

The 14-year-old Arushi was murdered along with Hemraj Banjade who was 45 years old then. There were a lot of suspects on the list of the accused including Arushi’s parents. This case received a lot of media coverage and aroused public interest. It was held as Trial by Media. For a very long time, Arushi’s parents had been held under custody. Still, it is not clear whether it was Arushi’s parents or the other two servants that worked in her house. Though Arushi’s parents have been acquitted, yet no one knows who killed Arushi and Hemraj.

  • Jessica Lal murder case

The case got highlighted with the heading ‘No one killed Jessica’ in the year 1999. The eyewitnesses had amnesia and there was hardly anyone who came forward to give an account of how an aspiring model was shot dead. Later people came to know that it was the businessman Manu Sharma who was refused by Jessica to serve liquor had shot her dead.

  • Pramod Mahajan murder case

Pramod Mahajan was a politician in the Bharatiya Janata Party. He was killed in a broad daylight inside his house. April 2006 Pramod was shot dead by his brother, Pravin. After killing his brother, Pravin walked to the nearest police station to confess that he had shot his brother Pramod. Pravin was sentenced to life imprisonment and later on died due to brain haemorrhage.

RELEVANT PROVISION FOR MURDER












principle ingredients of Murder:

  • Causing death of human being.
  • The Intention of causing death
  • Causing such bodily injury as the offender knows it is likely to cause death of a person.
  • Knowledge that the act done is sufficiently dangerous that in all probabilities it must cause death, 

The most confusing aspect is ‘intention’ as in both the provisions the intention is to cause death. Hence, you have to consider the degree of intention of offenders. If the person is killed in cold-blood or with well-planned then it is murder because the intention to kill is in high degree. On other hand, person is killed without pre-planned, in sudden fight or in sudden anger because of somebody’s provocation or instigation, then such death is called the culpable homicide. Hence, whether the act done is culpable homicide or murder is a question of fact. 

The distinction between the two is in the ‘intention’ and ‘knowledge’ of the culprit in committing the crime.

Punishment for murder (Section 302)

The punishment for murder is provided under Section 302 of IPC. Under this section whoever commits murder is punished with:

  • Death
  • Life imprisonment
  • Fine

Punishment for Culpable Homicide (Section 304)

Culpable homicide is not murder if it falls under any one of the five exceptions given under Section 300. Section 304 of IPC describes the punishments for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, that is:

  • Imprisonment for life,
  • Imprisonment for either description of a term extending up to ten years,
  • Fine.





For more details and notes please visit, share, follow and subscribe to the blog and youtube channel adityapedia. Dont forget to like our fb page too. Its just a click away - absolutely FREE